The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency threw out a Harvard study that it had funded on the benefits of reducing mercury emissions because the study showed that more stringent regulations would be justified by the health benefits. How much greater than the EPA estimates were the health benefits identified by the study? 100 times greater. No wonder the Bush administration didn't want any mention of it when the EPA released its watered down mercury emissions program for power plants.
(Comments are open to all. See the list of environmental blogs on my sidebar.)