tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861605.post111564579020006863..comments2024-03-24T11:01:27.668-04:00Comments on Resource Insights: The New Yorker climate change series: Part IIIKurt Cobbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05330759091950742285noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861605.post-1115934914223599842005-05-12T17:55:00.000-04:002005-05-12T17:55:00.000-04:00The 3. part of the series can be found here: http:...The 3. part of the series can be found here: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?050509fa_fact3<BR/><BR/>There doesn't seem to be a link on the front page, but I'm just glad they put it online.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861605.post-1115675467471067742005-05-09T17:51:00.000-04:002005-05-09T17:51:00.000-04:00It seems to me the jig is up. How could a global ...It seems to me the jig is up. How could a global culture which by and large won't even TALK about Oil & Natural Gas peaking, much less DO anything about it, address and do something about one of the direct (and immense) consequences of building a whole civilization on the burning fossil fuels? i.e., climate change. <BR/><BR/>The USA in particular is doing what James Kunstler calls "sleepingwalking into the future". Only one Congressman, and no major media have addressed the oil peak matter (and its economic and climatological implications), so what besides a sudden crisis --either energy-wise or climatological-- will wake the nation up? Even General Motors, who should have seen the new prices of gas coming, and whose very existence as a corporation depends on selling cars that people will buy, had its head in the sand and has gotten run over --for the second time! Duh! --CameronAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com